Showing posts with label dunne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dunne. Show all posts

August 18, 2010

Income Sharing Bill gaining support


Peter Dunne, United Future leader, is on the campaign trail promoting his income sharing bill.  He seems to be gaining public support.  A radio interview today sets out his view.  Seems to us to be a sensible option that provides real choice for parents all over New Zealand. For more details see the United website.  Those voters who are tired of the social engineering that tilts the playing field in the direction of both parents working will welcome this initiative.  It's disappointing to see the Labour Party rejecting this idea out of hand. John Key has indicated he has an open mind on the matter.  People who support this policy proposal need to show their support and write to their MP about it.

July 5, 2010

Chauvel opposes Income Splitting

Labour list MP, Charles Chauvel, has released a media statement apparently aimed at undermining United Future's income splitting policy. Income splitting is designed to enable parents to make their own choices about how they raise their children.

If one parent opts to stay at home to care for their own children then income splitting allows parents to be taxed as a couple instead of two individuals. In his media statement today Mr Chauvel says that in proposing this family-friendly policy Mr Dunne is out of touch with New Zealanders. 

Given that half the households in Ohariu are two parent families some observers might say it is not Mr Dunne who is out of tune with the electorate.

December 21, 2009

Time To Change Failed Recipe

Peter's Position blog sees the United Future leader advocating greater use of voluntary and not for profit organisations to help grapple with the thorny social and family issues that have been languishing in the "too hard" basket for decades now.

While there is always the risk that under-resourcing could compound existing social inequalities surely the time has come to try a new approach from the tried and failed framework of centralised government agencies attempting and failing to deal with entrenched failure in education, health, welfare and skills training?

If the challenges of appropriate accountability for public funding and necessary audits can be maintained or made simpler and more effective then perhaps the time has come for a decentralised approach to social service delivery.  Such an approach could work well with the desire by many iwi organisations to take greater autonomy for delivery of services to their own people.

December 15, 2009

Income splitting for tax purposes back in the spotlight


New Zealand families may yet get a choice on how they choose to work and pay tax. United Future leader, Hon Peter Dunne MP has announced the release of an issues paper looking at how income splitting might operate through an annual tax credit.

“Under income splitting, each partner in a relationship with children would be taxed on an equal share of their combined income, Revenue Minister and UnitedFuture leader Peter Dunne said today in releasing the issues paper.

The first round of consultation last year sought feedback on what people thought of income splitting, and attracted more than 200 responses, most of them favourable.

“Because income taxes are progressive, with high incomes attracting a higher rate of tax than low incomes, many families might pay less tax, providing some financial assistance when one parent works full-time and the other chooses to stay at home to care for the children,” Mr Dunne said.

“The issues paper proposes having income splitting operate through an annual tax credit, and seeks people’s feedback on how well such a system would work for them,” Mr Dunne said.

“Inland Revenue would calculate the end-of-year tax credit, which would be based on any difference between the tax the couple would pay on an individual basis and the tax they would pay by splitting their income for tax purposes.

“To be eligible for the tax credit, couples would have to be married, civil union partners or de facto partners, be New Zealand residents, and be primarily responsible for the day-to-day care of a dependent child under 18.

“Financial considerations often play a large role in parents deciding whether both should continue to work full-time or one stays home to care for the children,” he said.

“Income splitting is one way of enabling parents to have greater choice in their work and caring roles, and also recognises the valuable role played by parents who choose to opt out of the workforce to raise their children.

“I urge all interested parties to have their say on the workability of the tax credit that is set out in the paper.

“Once we have received the public’s feedback on the details of the proposed mechanism for making income splitting a reality, the next step will be to introduce enabling legislation next year, a move that is provided for in the confidence and supply agreement between UnitedFuture and National,” Mr Dunne said.

The issues paper, “An income splitting tax credit for families with children” is available at www.taxpolicy.ird.govt.nz.

Submissions close on 5 February 2010.













http://www.unitedfuture.org.nz/default,1291,dunne_unitedfutures_income_splitting_plans_take_shape.sm

Needed: A Bridge over troubled waters

In a world which is increasingly polarised in its politics, economics and beliefs about religion, race and gender, we desperately need peopl...