DPF over at Kiwiblog remains opposed to compulsory super because he is concerned that politicians of one stripe or another will eventually be tempted to spend the money on a pet project - rather than on funding citizens' retirement. What he overlooks, however, is that we already have a risky arrangement in place. It is called income tax and national superannuation. A new compulsory savings scheme should tag all funds for funding citizens' retirement and should be in the name of specific individuals. It should not be accessible for spending by government - unlike the present tax & spend arrangement.
The main benefit of a compulsory retirement savings scheme would be reduce New Zealand's dependence on overseas savings and capital for investment. The consequence of decades of borrowings - largely to fund housing - has been to increase the per capita debt of NZ towards to Icelandic proportions. A sovereign state cannot continue with such an approach without either the receivers one day being called in - in the form of the IMF in the case of countries - or dramatic reductions in citizens' living standards. Neither prospect is something New Zealanders can be blase about. Here's hoping the government has the courage to move to a compulsory retirement savings scheme - with safeguards to keep politicians away from our nesteggs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Distributism Explained
Distributism is being touted as the next best idea as an alternative way to do economics and politics in the 21st century. But what is Dis...

-
BBC Report today unveils the huge scale of bribery going on in Afghanistan. In fact it equals almost a quarter of the nation's GDP! N...
-
Business and residential ratepayer groups have frequently expressed concerns about ongoing increases in rates costs. The Wellington Chamber ...
-
This article appeared listing all the events linked to climate change. There is no doubt that the world's weather seems to be chan...
No comments:
Post a Comment